[lsb-discuss] LSB 2.0 and NPTL
George Kraft
gk4 at austin.ibm.com
Wed Sep 3 07:34:42 PDT 2003
It looks like we have some vsth-lite (pthreads) test setup issues;
however, the LSB's intent has always been to specify true POSIX Threads
once it's implemented in the kernel and libpthreads.
http://freestandards.org/pipermail/lsb-test/2003-July/001731.html
http://freestandards.org/pipermail/lsb-test/2003-July/001738.html
We will need to fix our tests and tweak the LSB 2.0 specification by Oct
17th.
George (gk4)
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 16:18, Darrin Thompson wrote:
> Will any of the planned LSB 2.0 modules require NPTL for compliance? I'm
> hoping for both the binary and the long format answer.
>
> --
> Darrin Thompson
> Progeny
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-discuss mailing list
> lsb-discuss at freestandards.org
> http://freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
--
George (gk4)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20030903/f05a8d02/attachment.pgp
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list