[lsb-discuss] LSB 2.0 and NPTL

George Kraft gk4 at austin.ibm.com
Wed Sep 3 07:34:42 PDT 2003

It looks like we have some vsth-lite (pthreads) test setup issues;
however, the LSB's intent has always been to specify true POSIX Threads
once it's implemented in the kernel and libpthreads.



We will need to fix our tests and tweak the LSB 2.0 specification by Oct

George (gk4)

On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 16:18, Darrin Thompson wrote:
> Will any of the planned LSB 2.0 modules require NPTL for compliance? I'm 
> hoping for both the binary and the long format answer.
> -- 
> Darrin Thompson
> Progeny
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-discuss mailing list
> lsb-discuss at freestandards.org
> http://freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
George (gk4)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20030903/f05a8d02/attachment.pgp 

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list