[lsb-discuss] PROPOSAL: requiring applications to be provided in RPM packaging format

anderson at freestandards.org anderson at freestandards.org
Mon Sep 22 12:04:36 PDT 2003


On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, George Kraft wrote:

> http://www.linuxbase.org/~gk4/requires-lsb-proposal.html

Should 3b be "completely passes lsbappchk, but has ......" ?


                                Stuart

anderson at freestandards.org                             Free Standards Group
Lead Developer, Written Specification                  Linux Standard Base
1024D/37A79149:                                        0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
                                                       BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149




More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list