[lsb-discuss] Re: [Lsb-specauth] [Patch] Remove all depreciated parts from gLSB's command section
kingdon at panix.com
Wed Sep 24 07:39:03 PDT 2003
> chown with '.' is a GNU extension, nevertheless they florish.
No, other way around. "." is the way it was since the feature was
first invented (BSD maybe, not sure it was in v7). ":" is a standards
committee invention designed to deal with "." being legal in a user or
> When the LSB requires the '.' then they cannot use SUSv3, when the
> shall not support the '.' (= full SUSv3) then they are forced to use the
> SUSv3. (Probably I see problem were are none.)
There is a problem with keeping "." as we have it (which is that
"chown user.one:group.two" is legal in SUS), but it might be
hypothetical rather than one we should worry about.
More information about the lsb-discuss