[lsb-discuss] plugins

[Bill Nottingham]

Darrin Thompson (darrint at progeny.com) said: 
> Perhaps I state that too broadly. My take is, the whole point of having 
> a standard is to be able to depend on things being a certain way. If LSB 
> contains a mozilla plugin ABI, mozilla plugin packaging standard, and 
> mozilla related FHS, then plugin writers can produce packages that either:

(coming in late on the conversation)

Does this imply actual standardization of the browser first? Because,
well, without that, I don't see the point.

Bill