[lsb-discuss] New Interfaces for 3.2/4.0
Alan Cox
alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Wed Aug 2 04:09:07 PDT 2006
Ar Maw, 2006-08-01 am 17:29 -0700, ysgrifennodd Nick Stoughton:
> _POSIX_MAPPED_FILES:
>
> Indispensable nowadays. Every system striving for POSIX compliance
> probably has it. This does not include systems using subprofiles.
>
> _POSIX_MEMORY_PROTECTION:
>
> Similar to _POSIX_MMAPED_FILES.
Disagree on these two. MMUless systems can implement almost everything
but these and there are a *lot* of MMUless boxes around (Linux
especially) that are otherwise pretty much fully POSIX.
The two could probably be merged.
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list