[lsb-discuss] error occurs in building lsbsi
Marvin Heffler
heffler at us.ibm.com
Thu Aug 3 07:17:23 PDT 2006
Sure,
The first problem you describe below is most likely a problem in the way
the lsbsi is created right now. To get around this problem you will need
to use "--nodeps" when installing some of the rpm packages. I was going to
put this into the test procedure instructions but was hoping to fix the
problem first.
The second problem is really just a warning notification. Somewhere in the
configuration it expects /usr/lib/libbfd-
> 2.17.50.0.1.so to be a symlink. During the build process it gets created
via a copy instead of as a symlink. The difference should not cause any
problems in the operation of the lsbsi.
Regards,
Marvin Heffler
Linux Standard Base
IBM Linux Technology Center
11501 Burnet Road, Zip 902-5B012
Austin, TX 78758
(512) 838-0953 T/L 678-0953
lsb-discuss-bounces at lists.freestandards.org wrote on 08/03/2006 01:12:19
AM:
> i ' ve met two questions in building the lsbsi:
> i've been trying building lsbsi on Ubuntu desktop 6.06,and i just do
> as the
sitehttp://www.freestandards.org/impl/lsbsi3.1-test.procedure.html
> step by step ,but when i install the lsb-tet3-lite in chroot ,it
> prompt as fellows:
> bash-3.1# rpm -ivh lsb-tet3-lite-3.7-4.lsb3.i486.rpm
> warning: lsb-tet3-lite-3.7-4.lsb3.i486.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature:
> NOKEY, key ID f9fc2b75
> error: Failed dependencies:
> /opt is needed by lsb-tet3-lite-3.7-4.lsb3.i486
> /opt/lsb-tet3-lite/lib/grw is needed by
lsb-tet3-lite-3.7-4.lsb3.i486
> /opt/lsb-tet3-lite/lib/ksh is needed by
lsb-tet3-lite-3.7-4.lsb3.i486
> /opt/lsb-tet3-lite/lib/perl is needed by
lsb-tet3-lite-3.7-4.lsb3.i486
> /opt/lsb-tet3-lite/lib/posix_sh is needed by lsb-tet3-
> lite-3.7-4.lsb3.i486
> /opt/lsb-tet3-lite/lib/python is needed by lsb-tet3-lite-3.
> 7-4.lsb3.i486
> /opt/lsb-tet3-lite/lib/tet3 is needed by
lsb-tet3-lite-3.7-4.lsb3.i486
> /opt/lsb-tet3-lite/lib/xpg3sh is needed by lsb-tet3-lite-3.
> 7-4.lsb3.i486
> and the next /sbin/ldconfig shows "/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libbfd-
> 2.17.50.0.1.so is not a symbolic link", is it not a symbolic link
> have anything to do with the lsbsi?
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-discuss mailing list
> lsb-discuss at lists.freestandards.org
> http://lists.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20060803/e8b24f96/attachment.htm
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list