[lsb-discuss] LSB-compliant way to get number of processors?
taggart at carmen.fc.hp.com
Mon Aug 7 15:49:33 PDT 2006
Nick Stoughton writes...
> -- quite a list! I see no reason why ALL these symbols shouldn't be
> added to the LSB at 3.2, though it is possible/probable that some are
> architecture specific.
... assuming they meet the LSB criteria. In addition the the arch-specific
concern you mention (which could be dealt with in arch supplements),
Have you checked the other distros?
Are these interfaces stable?
Are these interfaces best practice?
Do they behave the same on the various distros?
Is upstream willing to support them as standard interfaces?
Matt Taggart Open Source & Linux Organization R&D
taggart at fc.hp.com Hewlett-Packard
More information about the lsb-discuss