[lsb-discuss] statfs specification addition: review
tytso at mit.edu
Thu Dec 21 16:18:06 PST 2006
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:52:25PM -0800, Camp, TracyX E wrote:
> No, it just argues that xattr max length is something that the system
> should be able to tell me about via pathconf() or similar at run-time.
Agreed, but this almost certainly won't be done in time for LSB 4.0,
since we don't have that support in the mainline kernel or in glibc
today. The question is (assuming their is application interest in the
xattr interfaces) whether we should try to standardize the xattr
interfaces without that feature?
More information about the lsb-discuss