[lsb-discuss] regarding lsb 3.1

[subhranshu patel]

I downloaded the lsb runtime test 3.1.0.6 and saw the various implemented test suites.
  1.In some places xx_rpt is used instead of tet_infoline and tet_result.
  2.In some places cppair is used instead of tet_fork.( NOTE cppair internally calls tet_fork function)
   
  Which is the correct way for implementation.Should one be following the tetware programmers guide.

 				
---------------------------------
 Find out what India is talking about on  Yahoo! Answers India.
 So, what’s NEW about the NEW Yahoo! Messenger? Find out.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20060717/f0a0b799/attachment.htm