[lsb-discuss] Request for additional interfaces
imurdock at imurdock.com
Wed Jun 14 14:43:10 PDT 2006
On 6/14/06, Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk at suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> > Robert:
> > >Also need the name resolution library:
> > >libresolve
> > Please help us understand why. We've never been
> > approached with applications that actually needed
> > these routines so it hasn't been included to date.
> There is absolute no need for an application to link against
> libresolv. We should really not add them to LSB.
There's clearly *some* need, since we have an application developer who
must be doing it. I'm interested in Robert's feedback here.
"Don't look back--something might be gaining on you." --Satchel Paige
More information about the lsb-discuss