[lsb-discuss] LSB futures tracker: Rendezvous

Theodore Tso tytso at mit.edu
Mon Jun 26 06:01:40 PDT 2006

On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:49:25PM -0400, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> Right, but the issue with CUPS is whether the LSB should impose a
> particular spooler's ABI on runtime implementations.  Must Solaris's
> Linux compatibility layer, for example, include the CUPS ABI?

What ABI is being proposed to be standardized upon?  Maybe I'm missing
something, but wouldn't applications do well just shell out to either
/usr/bin/lpr or /usr/bin/lp?

						- GTed

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list