[lsb-discuss] LSB futures tracker: Rendezvous

Theodore Tso tytso at mit.edu
Mon Jun 26 06:01:40 PDT 2006


On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:49:25PM -0400, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> 
> Right, but the issue with CUPS is whether the LSB should impose a
> particular spooler's ABI on runtime implementations.  Must Solaris's
> Linux compatibility layer, for example, include the CUPS ABI?
> 

What ABI is being proposed to be standardized upon?  Maybe I'm missing
something, but wouldn't applications do well just shell out to either
/usr/bin/lpr or /usr/bin/lp?

						- GTed




More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list