[lsb-discuss] LSB futures tracker: Rendezvous
till.kamppeter at gmx.net
Mon Jun 26 06:08:21 PDT 2006
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:49:25PM -0400, Jeff Licquia wrote:
>>Right, but the issue with CUPS is whether the LSB should impose a
>>particular spooler's ABI on runtime implementations. Must Solaris's
>>Linux compatibility layer, for example, include the CUPS ABI?
> What ABI is being proposed to be standardized upon? Maybe I'm missing
> something, but wouldn't applications do well just shell out to either
> /usr/bin/lpr or /usr/bin/lp?
lp and lpr only allow sending a print job. They are not able to
- Enumerate the available printers
- Enumerate the options which are available for the printer selected by
- Send the job with supplied options (option supplying is not done the
same way with all spoolers)
- List jobs which are in the queue
- Kill user-selected job
All this functionality is proveded by CUPS, CUPS-enhanced IPP, and
should also be provided by PAPI.
More information about the lsb-discuss