[lsb-discuss] LSB question: ncursesw

[Matt Taggart]

"Wichmann, Mats D" writes...

> It would be binary incompatible with the current library,
> so it's not going to be .so.5 any more in that case:

Any errors in the way I described what he intends to do are purely my fault 
in translating. The maintainer is Daniel Jacobowitz and he knows his stuff 
so I'm sure he has some sort of plan that either upstream has endorsed 
and/or won't break binary compatibility.

Dan,

Any comments on
  http://lists.freestandards.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/2006-June/002451.html
?

-- 
Matt Taggart        Open Source & Linux Organization R&D
taggart at fc.hp.com   Hewlett-Packard