[lsb-discuss] LSB adoption acceleration proposal

[Alexey Eremenko]

>
>
> It's not a bad idea, but it's not something that we've gained
> any traction with.  Project either seem not to see the need,
> or need more than the LSB has in it today, or either have
> been burned by or are using autopackage (either case may leave
> then unlikely to look at LSB). Even where we've done the
> work we haven't gotten people to adopt it (apache, samba,
> rsync, python, etc.)
>
> This is more in light of a "be aware of this" than something
> to say not to work on it.
>
>
You say some people work with Autopackage... ?

Then maybe Autopackage team itself will adopt LSB - It is in their best
interest, because it will make Autopackage's developer's work easier.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20060929/343b1b8d/attachment.htm