[lsb-discuss] Moving Qt4 to required for LSB 3.2

Banginwar, Rajesh rajesh.banginwar at intel.com
Fri Apr 20 09:22:21 PDT 2007

Have we received further tests from Trolltech or someone to cover many
of the Qt4 classes? I think without adequate coverage we should not add
any new module in LSB.



>-----Original Message-----
>From: lsb-discuss-bounces at lists.freestandards.org 
>[mailto:lsb-discuss-bounces at lists.freestandards.org] On Behalf 
>Of Wichmann, Mats D
>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:48 AM
>To: lsb-discuss at lists.freestandards.org
>Subject: [lsb-discuss] Moving Qt4 to required for LSB 3.2
>I'm about to flip the switch and turn the optional Qt4
>module into a mandatory one, and regenerate the tools
>accordingly in the devel (will be 3.2) branches in LSB
>version control.  We've talked about doing this, but now 
>that it's ready to happen I'm hesitating a moment to ask
>if there are any real objections
>So - does anyone think this is premature?
>lsb-discuss mailing list
>lsb-discuss at lists.freestandards.org

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list