[lsb-discuss] appchk bug?

Konstantin Vlasov vlasov at ispras.ru
Thu Jul 12 07:01:53 PDT 2007


RS> If an executable depends on an so which does not end in .so appchk does
RS> not check the library and flags the library as "missing".

RS> For example, given the following tree:

RS> /tmp/myapp/bin
RS>      myapp
RS>      mylib.so.1

RS> Running appchk

RS> lsbappchk -D/tmp/myapp/bin -j /tmp/myapp/bin/myapp

RS> The journal will produce a DT_NEEDED message for mylib.so.1 as not being 
RS> part of the LSB. The way I interpret the -D option this library should 
RS> be found, checked and there should not be a complaint about DT_NEEDED 
RS> for myapp?

OK,  we'll  fix  this.  appchk  will  consider  ALL  libraries  in the directory
specified  by  -D  as  a  part  of  application  package  without  regard to the
extensions. 


-- 
Konstantin Vlasov
 
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
web:    http://www.linuxtesting.org
e-mail: vlasov at ispras.ru




More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list