[lsb-discuss] appchk bug?
Konstantin Vlasov
vlasov at ispras.ru
Thu Jul 12 07:01:53 PDT 2007
RS> If an executable depends on an so which does not end in .so appchk does
RS> not check the library and flags the library as "missing".
RS> For example, given the following tree:
RS> /tmp/myapp/bin
RS> myapp
RS> mylib.so.1
RS> Running appchk
RS> lsbappchk -D/tmp/myapp/bin -j /tmp/myapp/bin/myapp
RS> The journal will produce a DT_NEEDED message for mylib.so.1 as not being
RS> part of the LSB. The way I interpret the -D option this library should
RS> be found, checked and there should not be a complaint about DT_NEEDED
RS> for myapp?
OK, we'll fix this. appchk will consider ALL libraries in the directory
specified by -D as a part of application package without regard to the
extensions.
--
Konstantin Vlasov
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
web: http://www.linuxtesting.org
e-mail: vlasov at ispras.ru
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list