[lsb-discuss] allowing apps to "register" with the system (was Re: application certification questions)
Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Fri Jun 8 15:21:11 PDT 2007
I was hoping someone else would pick this up...
> Now that 3.2 is being mentioned, I thought I'd bring this up
> again from the application point of view.
> Has anything been decided on for handling files that must be installed
> outside the application directory - like Mozilla plugins?
I haven't heard that anything has happened here yet.
> Also, what about backward compatibility - requiring LSB 3.x in the
> installer causing the installer to fail on systems that may not be LSB
> certified but have all other required software?
the whole concept is that you have some way to check for
full LSB conformance as a prerequisite. if you don't
want to require that ... then you shouldn't require it
in the package.
I don't think this is unique to LSB. If you, for example,
build a package on RHEL it will (unless you explicitly tell it
not to) generate dependencies on a LOT of things from that
system, and it won't run on systems with older versions of
those packages even if they might on a technical level be
able to run your software.
More information about the lsb-discuss