[lsb-discuss] RFC: matherr interface
Vladimir Rubanov
vrub at ispras.ru
Mon Jun 25 05:32:54 PDT 2007
ISPRAS' vote is to definitely deprecate this.
/Vladimir.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lsb-discuss-bounces at lists.freestandards.org [mailto:lsb-discuss-
> bounces at lists.freestandards.org] On Behalf Of Wichmann, Mats D
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 2:56 AM
> To: lsb-discuss at lists.freestandards.org
> Subject: [lsb-discuss] RFC: matherr interface
>
>
>
> It is my impression that matherr is completely
> obsoltete at this point, superseded by IEEE
> Floating Point error handling.
>
> I'd like to deprecate matherr for eventual
> removal from LSB, at least partly because it
> triggers a problem with the C++ namespace
> (it defines a struct exception, which is a
> reserved word in C++) - and if not used there
> doesn't seem much need to keep it around.
> In the past there's been internal agreement
> with this idea (including a fast-track to
> removel); now we have the evindence of 300+
> captured apps in the LSB database none of
> which use it.
>
> But throwing it open to a wider pool of experts,
> is there a reason why matherr is still a useful
> interface?
>
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-discuss mailing list
> lsb-discuss at lists.freestandards.org
> http://lists.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list