[lsb-discuss] LSB 3.1 Update 1 status (and minutes for 2/20 and 2/27)

Ian Murdock imurdock at imurdock.com
Fri Mar 2 02:51:53 PST 2007

Feedback on the current beta packages:

The APT version of the Distribution Testkit works now; however, it pulls
down all of the test packages. Since it's APT, people who install it are
presumably connected to the network, so isn't it more appropriate to have
"apt-get install lsb-task-dist-testkit" only install the manager package?

There's something wrong with the Debian packages. /opt/lsb/test and
/opt/lsb/distr-testkit (at least) are mode 700. May be others.

On the first screen of the manager, it might be worthwhile to add "If
you're using a beta version of the Distribution Testkit, please select
the custom option, and the standard option will use the released test
packages rather than the beta packages." That's what got me last time.


On 3/1/07, Ian Murdock <imurdock at imurdock.com> wrote:
> 2/20: Stew Benedict, John Cherry, Darren Davis, Tom Hanrahan, Russ
> Herrold, Dan Kohn, Jeff Licquia, Marc Miller, Ian Murdock, Robert
> Schweikert, Mats Wichmann
> 2/27: Stew Benedict, John Cherry, Tom Hanrahan, Marvin Heffler, Russ
> Herrold, Dan Kohn, Jeff Licquia, Marc Miller, Ian Murdock, Robert
> Schweikert, Kay Tate
> Primary agenda items for 2/20 and 2/27 were finalization of LSB 3.1 Update
> 1. We also talked a bit about LSB 3.2 issues, primarily the need for a "How
> to write an LSB module" document (to make it easier for people building
> modules "around the edges" to contribute) as well as the need for a more
> structured/predictable build process, since most of the delays in the
> update are due to build process. I'll write up a summary of these
> issues in the 3/5 minutes, which will be devoted to the topic of 3.2.
> First things first: As mentioned on the call, I'm setting the
> release date of LSB 3.1 Update 1 to March 12. We're
> planning a press release for March 19, so this is a HARD STOP.
> Most of the previous blockers appear to be dealt with now, and I've
> updated the Downloads page accordingly--please have a look, and let
> me know if you notice any problems.
> (Sorry, my caps lock key got stuck.)
> Here are outstanding issues:
> * Mats: We still need the Specifications page text.
> * Stew has done some work on enabling profiles in the tools,
> and I talked with the RAS team this morning about how to expose
> profiles in the DTK Manager. In summary, we'll be launching Update
> 1 with two profiles: "Core and C++" and "Core, C++, and Desktop".
> In the DTK Manager, the certification mode will add a drop down
> menu for selecting the profiles with those two options, and with
> "Core, C++, and Desktop" as the default selection. This will be
> in the same place the user selects architecture and LSB version.
> Stew reports that, at the command line level, the switch is "-T core",
> which is mildly confusing (since it's actually Core and C++) and "-T
> desktop" (or no option at all, since "everything" is the default here
> too). Since most users will be using the DTK Manager, I'm not too worried
> about -T core, but I suppose if it's easy to fix, we could change it.
> As discussed, there will continue to be a single certification--
> profiles will be listed in the product directory (there will be
> a third column for Profile alongside LSB Version and
> Architectures). All currently certified distributions will be marked as
> tested against the "Core, C++, and Desktop" profile.
> The new DTK Manager with the profile support will be available in a
> few days, and will be ready to be rolled into a new bundle by early
> next week.
> * Signed packages: My understanding is that we have this done on the
> RPM side, just need instructions for the Downloads page for how to add
> keys to the keyring (Russ). Jeff is looking at signing the APT repos.
> * Russ was going to look at the RPMs and yum repositories to make sure
> we've done everything the proper RPM way.
> * Jeff was going to prepare 3.0 versions of the SDK and App Testkit
> (in both bundle and repo form--bundles may already exist, not sure).
> * The Certification page needs to be updated to reflect the new testkits,
> naming (Distribution vs. Runtime), and profiles. John Cherry and I are
> working on this along with a simplified/streamlined certification process
> * We need to resolve the versioning question (3.1.0-n vs. 3.1.1-1).
> * We need to write release notes (Ian, with help from Mats, Jeff, and
> Stew).
> March 12!
> -ian
> --
> Ian Murdock
> 317-863-2590
> http://ianmurdock.com/
> "Don't look back--something might be gaining on you." --Satchel Paige

Ian Murdock

"Don't look back--something might be gaining on you." --Satchel Paige

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list