[lsb-discuss] Getting started with LSB Sample Implementation environment

[Banginwar, Rajesh]

Daniel,
	The BE is not meant as your run time environment at this time.
It is expected that the built binaries are taken outside of the
environment to debug or validate (in SI or another LSB complient distro)

Thanks,

-Rajesh 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: lsb-discuss-bounces at lists.freestandards.org 
>[mailto:lsb-discuss-bounces at lists.freestandards.org] On Behalf 
>Of Daniel Yek
>Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:07 PM
>To: Lsb-Discuss
>Subject: Re: [lsb-discuss] Getting started with LSB Sample 
>Implementation environment
>
>So, helloworld didn't execute because of wrong dynamic linker 
>specified in 
>the header. With a symbolic link created, I'm able to run 
>helloworld now. I 
>was just about at this point the last time I tackle SI.
>
>bash-3.1$ ./lsbappchk helloworld
>Checking binary helloworld
>Incorrect program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.2
>Header[ 1] PT_INTERP       Failed
>Found wrong intepreter in .interp section: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 
>instead of: 
>/lib/ld-lsb.so.3
>
>
>bash-3.1$ ls -l /lib/ld-linux.so.2
>lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Mar  2 12:55 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> 
>/lib/ld-2.4.so
>
>bash-3.1$ ./helloworld
>Hello World!
>
>
>So, my immediate question is what I need to do so that LSB BE 
>will get the 
>dynamic linker correct?
>
>My BE is probably more than 4 month old. I wonder if there is 
>any changes 
>in LSB packages such that if I were to set up a new BE, problems would 
>disappear.
>
>
>-- 
>Daniel Yek
>
>
>At 12:30 PM 3/2/2007, Daniel Yek wrote:
>>OK, I finished setting up a new LSB SI on i386 Ubuntu Edgy as follow:
>>
>>wget
>>http://ftp.freestandards.org/pub/lsb/impl/released-3.1.0/binar
>y/ia32/lsbsi-core-ia32-3.1.1.tar.bz2
>>
>>sudo -i
>>bunzip2 --keep lsbsi-core-ia32-3.1.1.tar.bz2
>>cd /opt
>>tar xvf /home/dyek/temp/lsbsi-core-ia32-3.1.1.tar
>>
>>sudo /usr/sbin/chroot /opt/lsbsi-core-ia32
>>
>>/usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/sh dyek
>>chown dyek:dyek /opt/lsbsi-core-ia32/home/dyek
>>cp helloworld /opt/lsbsi-core-ia32/home/dyek/
>>
>>bash-3.1# su dyek
>>sh-3.1$ cd
>>sh-3.1$ pwd
>>/home/dyek
>>
>>  From outside SI, copy helloworld built from LSB BE into SI.
>>
>>sh-3.1$ ./helloworld
>>sh: ./helloworld: No such file or directory
>>
>>Can core package alone support execution of helloworld?
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>
>>--
>>Daniel Yek
>>
>>
>>At 11:33 AM 3/2/2007, Daniel Yek wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I didn't manage to get LSB Sample Implementation working 
>the last time I
>> >tried it. I'm attacking the problem again and I really need 
>support from
>> >LSB SI expert if I ever have a chance of getting it working.
>> >
>> >So, I built a C HelloWord program in the LSB Build Environment:
>> >
>> >bash-3.1$ gcc -o helloworld helloworld.c
>> >
>> >I then copied helloworld into the SI environment and 
>attempt to execute it:
>> >bash-3.1$ ./helloworld
>> >bash: ./helloworld: No such file or directory
>> >
>> >I couldn't.
>> >
>> >I tried a lot of workaround the last time around and was only barely
>> >making ever slight progress.
>> >
>> >I originally did the same thing on a i386 machine and got 
>the same result.
>> >Now, that hard drive is mounted on a x86_64 machine and I 
>think there are
>> >potentially more incompatibilities. So, I'm going to set up 
>a new LSB SI
>> >on a i386 machine and get back to the mailing list later.
>> >
>> >I need someone to point out to me how SI can be utilized 
>successfully and
>> >what mistake I made. More info. later as I set up a new SI 
>environment.
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Daniel Yek
>
>_______________________________________________
>lsb-discuss mailing list
>lsb-discuss at lists.freestandards.org
>http://lists.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
>