[lsb-discuss] lsbappchk output help

[Simon White]

Hi,

Could anyone point me to information for the following regarding whether
they can be ignored or should be removed and how?

compareElfhdr: e_type isn't expected value ET_EXEC, found 3 instead
FAIL
compareElfhdr: e_type isn't expected value ET_EXEC, found 3 instead

Section .rodata: sh_flags is wrong. expecting 2, got 32
FAIL
Section .rodata: sh_flags is wrong. expecting 2, got 32

WARNING
ignoring .debug_aranges: Not in the LSB but not loaded

[snip] other .debug_*

Regards,
Simon

-- 
Over 2 Million Holiday Gift Ideas - Take a Look!
mail.com shopping at  http://mail.shopping.com/?linkin_id=8033174

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20071127/13291f8f/attachment.htm