[lsb-discuss] Fwd: Using BSD mtree as a simple "ISV ready" representation
n3npq at mac.com
Thu Apr 17 14:07:35 PDT 2008
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Jeff Johnson <n3npq at mac.com>
> Date: April 17, 2008 5:00:07 PM EDT
> To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at xenotime.net>
> Subject: Re: [lsb-discuss] Using BSD mtree as a simple "ISV ready"
> On Apr 17, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:28:53 -0400 Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>> The code is there for anyone who wishes. The ideas were implemented
>>> linux was born. Nothing new in stat(2) and digests and archives and
>>> since forever.
>> Where is "there"?
> Several places:
> In rpm-5.1.0 released this week. See Freshmeat.
> Or snapshot(s) at http://rpm5.org.
> There's cvs as as well.
> The port is in rpmio/rpmmtree.c.
> Meanwhile mtree(8) (modified to use XML! XML XML!) is the proposal
> for LSB.
> I really don't personally care whether mtree(8) or rpm5.org code is
> used. Any reasonably
> competent programmer could knock out a mtree(8) port in a weekend, and
> my port started from OWL linux packaging by Dmitri Levin before adding
> modern patches for mtree. Oddly, mtree has a vanishing small
> presence in linux.
> The port is rather straightforward, the mtree(8) code has been
> around for 2 decades.
> Ironically mtree(8) is really no different than the simple
> directory hierarchy producing
> an XML blob as proposed by Ted T'so this week. Nothing hard abt stat
> Well there's lots that's hard abt stat(2), all standards related,
> but that's a different matter ...
> 73 de Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lsb-discuss