[lsb-discuss] [Lf_carrier] LSB 3.2 Embedded Profile

Jeff Licquia jeff at licquia.org
Fri Apr 18 07:05:56 PDT 2008

Carlos Manuel Duclos Vergara wrote:
> Now that I reread this, shouldn't it be the other way around? I mean, if you are LSB 3.2 certified
> for sure you are CGL, but if you are CGL then by definition you do not fulfill LSB 3.2 requirements....

For *applications*, Dan had it right.  An application that uses no more 
than the CGL subset interfaces will comply with the full LSB, since the 
CGL subset interfaces are all part of the full LSB.  But an app 
certified against full LSB could, say, use interfaces from GTK+, which 
would not be part of the CGL subset.

You are entirely correct, of course, when describing distributions.

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list