[lsb-discuss] Linux Application Checker impressions
Alexey Khoroshilov
khoroshilov at ispras.ru
Sun Aug 10 15:30:43 PDT 2008
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov at ispras.ru> wrote:
>
>>> 1) Shouldn't it have LSB profiles in its output (e.g. "your app is not LSB
>>> 3.1 compliant because...")?
>>>
>> [Linux Application Checker already outputs this in the summary]:
>>
>> "There are 11 of 27 distributions that provide all the required
>> libraries and interfaces.
>> The Application uses 10 external libraries incompatible with LSB 3.2."
>>
>> The second line presents the summary of LSB compliance of the application
>> under test and it contains a hyper link to the list of the "10 external
>> libraries incompatible with LSB 3.2". More details are available at the "LSB
>> Certification" tab.
>>
>> Do you mean to extend this information? Or may be to make its representation
>> more visible?
>>
>
> For some reason, I expected the list of distributions to
> include the various past versions of LSB (and possibly the
> upcoming draft LSB 4).
> You might do some usability testing
> and see if real users also expect the data to show up in the
> distro table rather than called out in a separate text line.
> I suspect some users might look only at the table.
>
You are right, we have to do more usability testing. Our current design
assumes that the summary at the top of the results page definitely grabs
attention of a newcomer. Might be it is not a valid assumption.
In any case, presentation of compliance to different LSB versions in the
table is a good idea.
> BTW another thing that was slightly harder than it should have
> been was to see which of our app's files were referencing which
> file. I seem to recall that needed about three clicks more
> than I expected, which made it a little hard to discover.
>
At the moment we have two suggestions:
- to add application's files information to pop up detailed reports;
- to add an extra tab representing application's files, their internal
and external dependencies.
Any more ideas?
--
Thank you,
Alexey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20080811/da59c5e0/attachment.htm
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list