[lsb-discuss] lsb-libchk of LSB3.2 failed
Denis Silakov
silakov at ispras.ru
Tue Aug 26 02:16:30 PDT 2008
I guess this is the problem described here:
http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2127
Development version of libchk should not report these failures, but it
seems that updated libchk for 3.2 is not available at the moment.
Hao Liu wrote:
> Hi, guys,
> i'm running lsb-libchk-3.2.2-1, there're 14 failed all about
> libQtSvg.so.4 :
>
> libQtSvg.so.4 86 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 87 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 88 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 90 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 91 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 92 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 93 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 96 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 97 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 98 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 100 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 101 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 102 FAIL
> libQtSvg.so.4 103 FAIL
>
>
> I really don't know what's going wrong here, becos I find I can't find
> the test cases from the source:
> src/lsb-libchk-3.2.1/tests/misc/libchk/libQtSvg_so_4.c
>
> Additional info:
> #uname -a
> Linux dhcp-65-86.nay.redhat.com 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Thu May 1
> 06:28:41 EDT 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
> #cat /etc/redhat-release
> Fedora release 9.90.1 (Rawhide)
> #rpm -q qt-x11
> qt-x11-4.4.0-15.fc10.i386
>
> if there's any more info you need to know, plz let me know.
>
> Could somebody help to look into it? Thank you.
>
> All the best,
> Hao Liu
>
--
Regards,
Denis Silakov
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list