[lsb-discuss] lsb-libchk of LSB3.2 failed

[Hao Liu]

Denis Silakov wrote:
> I guess this is the problem described here:
>
> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2127
>
> Development version of libchk should not report these failures, but it 
> seems that updated libchk for 3.2 is not available at the moment.
>
> Hao Liu wrote:
>> Hi, guys,
>>   i'm running lsb-libchk-3.2.2-1, there're 14 failed all about 
>> libQtSvg.so.4 :
>>
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 86 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 87 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 88 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 90 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 91 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 92 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 93 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 96 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 97 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 98 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 100 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 101 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 102 FAIL
>>     libQtSvg.so.4 103 FAIL
>>      
>> I really don't know what's going wrong here, becos I find I can't 
>> find the test cases from the source: 
>> src/lsb-libchk-3.2.1/tests/misc/libchk/libQtSvg_so_4.c
>>
>> Additional info:
>> #uname -a
>> Linux dhcp-65-86.nay.redhat.com 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Thu May 1 
>> 06:28:41 EDT 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
>> #cat /etc/redhat-release
>> Fedora release 9.90.1 (Rawhide)
>> #rpm -q qt-x11
>> qt-x11-4.4.0-15.fc10.i386
>>
>> if there's any more info you need to know, plz let me know.
>>
>> Could somebody help to look into it? Thank you.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Hao Liu
>>   
>
Thank you, man, it's exactly what I need.

All the best,
Hao Liu