[lsb-discuss] nss question: did we close on the nspr issue?
Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Thu Aug 28 10:55:08 PDT 2008
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Wichmann, Mats D
> <mats.d.wichmann at intel.com> wrote:
>> A while back there was some discussion about the
>> need for nspr. nspr is clearly an internal dependency,
>> but if it's /only/ internal it doesn't necessarily have
>> to be exposed in LSB. During a discussion yesterday,
>> it turns out LSB participants weren't clear on whether
>> we'd closed out that question or not.
>> Does the nspr library and some set of interfaces
>> need to be exposed in LSB? Or is the current
>> proposed state sufficient for what we want to
> I meant to write about this issue yesterday but forgot.
> Some NSPR functions need to be exposed to use
> the SSL functions in NSS. These NSPR functions
> need to be exposed in LSB.
> Since NSPR is a finished product and its API has
> been stable for years, I have no problem exposing
> all the NSPR functions in LSB.
> Wan-Teh Chang
Okay, if you give us some more detailed pointers,
we'll get going on this bit.
More information about the lsb-discuss