[lsb-discuss] Looking at 4.0 work
Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Thu Feb 14 08:32:45 PST 2008
Sam Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Wichmann, Mats D
> <mats.d.wichmann at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Jeff and I have been hacking away at the project
>> plan wiki page, bugs, and attendant detail pages,
>> and it's probably pretty different than what it
>> looked like the last time most of you scanned it,
>> so it's worth another look:
>>
>> https://www.linux-foundation.org/en/ProjectPlan40
>>
>>
>> One interesting section is the section entitled
>> "Summary: Proposed Libraries".
>
> Looking at these I see several of the core SDL (http://libsdl.org/)
> libraries listed:
> * libSDL
> * libSDL_mixer
> * libSDL_image
...
> So, my two cents if these become desired/wanted for inclusion in the
> LSB would be that libSDL would be okay, but SDL_mixer and SDL_image
> may not be.
although lower on the usage chart, these others also showed up:
libSDL_Pango, libSDL_gfx, libSDL_net, libSDL_sound, libSDL_ttf
any comments there?
-- mats
who was hoping the comments flooding in would all be of the
sort "no, we shouldn't add any of these" :)
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list