[lsb-discuss] What version of glibc to target?
Jon 'maddog' Hall
maddog at li.org
Wed Feb 20 08:21:44 PST 2008
I will chime in here and hopefully paraphrase what Ted and Mats have
Major release numbers 4.x, 5.x of the LSB should be a signal to both
ISVs and Distribution vendors of:
o major new functionality
o changes to binary compatibility
Minor release numbers (X.1, X.2, etc.) should be
o tightening up of specifications
o fixes to the specification
o *minor* *additions* to the specification for new functionality
At Digital we had a third level to the numbering scheme (X.x.a) where
the "a" was an architecture dependent release.
Coupled with this numbering scheme is a roadmap that is at least two
major releases out, so people could plan where to do their work.
Therefore the customers could make a decision if they were going to
support a "4.0" release, a "4.1" release or skip directly to a "5.0"
Sorry if this email is redundant to y'all, but the numbering scheme
worked well for us, and our customers appreciated the planning it
Jon "maddog" Hall
Executive Director Linux International(R)
email: maddog at li.org 80 Amherst St.
Voice: +1.603.672.4557 Amherst, N.H. 03031-3032 U.S.A.
Board Member: Uniforum Association
Board Member Emeritus: USENIX Association (2000-2006)
(R)Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in several
(R)Linux International is a registered trademark in the USA used
to a license from Linux Mark Institute, authorized licensor of Linus
Torvalds, owner of the Linux trademark on a worldwide basis
(R)UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the USA and other
More information about the lsb-discuss