[lsb-discuss] question on missing zcat command
Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Fri Jan 4 12:49:44 PST 2008
George Kraft wrote:
> Apparently it was intentionally deferred from LSB 3.1.
> George (gk4)
thanks George, you're quite right. I had forgotten
that discussion. I recall now - the main issue was
the last comment, that spec was already at ISO for
review and it just didn't seem prudent. It was deferred
to 4.0 when that was expected to be the next release,
at the time we hadn't planned a 3.2.
I'll update that bug with references and blockers.
More information about the lsb-discuss