[lsb-discuss] Version number on LSB 3.1 base package?
Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Fri Jun 27 05:17:44 PDT 2008
Dan Kegel wrote:
> "lsb-core-noarch ... shall have a version of 3.0"
> Is this a typo?
It's not, but perhaps an issue that should be revisited.
The idea was that revisions of the LSB within a major
version should be compatible so that the minor version
didn't need to show through at the packaging level.
Seems like some executive decisions led to a lot more
fundamental changes througout the 3.x series and that
might not have been quite right (we'll have to think
about this a bit).
More information about the lsb-discuss