[lsb-discuss] Question of LSB DDK for printing

Till Kamppeter till.kamppeter at gmail.com
Wed Mar 5 07:07:44 PST 2008


Tatsuya Saito wrote:
>> I think it makes more sense if "filternames" definition also 
>> applies to 
>> the "*cupsFilter: ..." entries. Please try the attached 
>> rpmmacros file. 
>> It will also apply the path additions defined by "filternames" to the 
>> "*cupsFilter: ..." entries of the PPD files.
>>
>> If it works for you please tell me and I will upload the file.
> Thank you for updating rpmmacros.
> I tried it and confirmed it replaced "*cupsfilter" path by absolute path
> defined "filternames".
> I have no problem on my case, defining absolute path in filternames :)
> 
> But it adds "/opt/splix/bin/" directory to "*cupsfilter" if somebody define
>  only filename in "filternames" like
>  %define filternames rastertospl2
> Because you changed code on related FoomaticRIPCommandLine.
> I think it has to add "/opt/splix/cups/lib/filter" in ppd.
>

To get /opt/splix/cups/lib/filter added to the use the full path in 
"%define filternames ...":

%define filternames /opt/splix/cups/lib/filter/rastertospl2

A "%define filternames" directive without path always defaults to the 
executable directory (/opt/splix/bin).

>> Which source file do you mean?
> OPVP driver of IPC extention type.
> It needs to load module and stream data such as following.
> When they call next module, they use module name in these source file.
>  cupsfilter -> gs -> opvp ipc client library
> -> opvp ipc server executable module -> opvp driver
> 

[...]

>> *FoomaticRIPCommandLine: "export 
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/nec/lib/; gs ..."
>>
>> I could also add a macro for doing this with the PPD files.
> Some drivers/filters executable path is NOT in the PPD file.
> For example, path of opvp ipc server executable module is written in
> Makefile.am of opvp ipc source.
> Of course, it differs from one case to the next.
> 

You can use "%define filternames ..." to make the paths to the OPVP 
driver executable appear in the PPD.

> I think we may need a policy of the way to call executable modules,
> changing path environment or using absolute path, or more way if you have.

This we should really do in LSB 4.0.

    Till




More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list