[lsb-discuss] [Printing-architecture] LSB 4.0 and printing

Wichmann, Mats D mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Thu Mar 27 07:49:40 PDT 2008


> Klaus Singvogel wrote:
>> Johannes Meixner wrote:
>>> I would very much appreciate it if SANE1 was LSB standard.
>> 
>> Still asking myself, why this package should become mandatory for all
>> kind of machines then, especially why for servers?

Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Lets's a SANE only to the desktop part of the LSB. Is this possible?
> 
>     Till
> 

Sure, it's easy to position it so that it sits in the
desktop module. The fact is, though, that distributions
tend to certify to the "whole LSB" (actually, at the moment,
that's the only certification offered, although that will
change if there's demand for a server-only cert) so this 
may not actually buy that much.  

This is always a reasonable question to ask for every
new feature:  is it appropriate for everyone ("core")
or should it be in an extended module that maybe doesn't
apply to all systems.  And then, if you partition things
that way, what does it mean to applications who want
to depend on it?  





More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list