[lsb-discuss] Fate of libstdc++.so.7?
john.dallman at siemens.com
Wed Apr 8 07:02:52 PDT 2009
Wichmann, Mats D [mailto:mats.d.wichmann at intel.com] wrote:
> Probably... in any case it will appear as an additional
> requirement that will not remove the need for a supported
> version of libstdc++.so.6
That's because of the forwards compatibility undertakings, of
course; LSB 3.x doesn't insist on an libstdc++.so.5, does it?
Parasolid Porting Engineer
More information about the lsb-discuss