[lsb-discuss] Thinking about future LSB features

Dallman, John john.dallman at siemens.com
Wed Feb 18 07:08:21 PST 2009

Mats wrote:
> > Oh, well. So much for that idea. Is there any other obvious way
> > to overcome the objections about Motif not being free enough?
> well, the classic way is to describe only the interface, and
> if free implementations can meet the requirement, then fine.
> I'd probably be a bit surprised if truly intensive Motif
> applications consider Lesstif "good enough". The problems
> there are I believe Lesstif only claims source compatibility,
> not binary compatibility, and I think the project has gone
> rather stale.

Not really an attractive proposition, is it? 

John Dallman
Parasolid Porting Engineer

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list