[lsb-discuss] AppChecker Survey List

Robert Schweikert rschweikert at novell.com
Wed Mar 11 12:59:38 PDT 2009


I think this question does not add value and could be removed.

I think we should have a text area that allows survey takers to enter
free form comments w.r.t. their AppChecker experience.

Robert

Dallman, John wrote:
> For AppChecker, I presume? How about this phrasing?
> 
>  
> 
> “It’s more important for AppChecker to  support plenty of versions of the
> 
> mainstream distributions than for it to support one or two versions of lots
> 
> of distributions.”
> 
>  
> 
> --
> John Dallman
> Parasolid Porting Engineer
> 
> Siemens PLM Software
> 46 Regent Street, Cambridge, CB2 1DP
> United Kingdom
> Tel: +44-1223-371554
> john.dallman at siemens.com
> www.siemens.com/plm
> 
> *From:* brian at proffitt.org [mailto:brian at proffitt.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Brian Proffitt
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:20 PM
> *To:* Dallman, John
> *Cc:* lsb-discuss
> *Subject:* Re: [lsb-discuss] AppChecker Survey List
> 
>  
> 
> It's supposed to be "support across multiple versions of a single
> distribution is more important than support for multiple distros," I
> believe.
> 
> BKP
> 
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Dallman, John
> <john.dallman at siemens.com <mailto:john.dallman at siemens.com>> wrote:
> 
> Fairly good survey, but this question is unclear:
> 
>> Cross-version support is more important than cross-distro portability.
> 
> This could mean several things. It could be taken to as "I think having
> different versions of my app be compatible with each other is more
> important than them being compatible across several distributions",
> which is two issues that aren't strongly related, except insofar as
> they both involve development time.
> 
> It could also be taken as "I think having AppChecker tell me about
> differences in interfaces used by different versions of my app is
> more important than what it tells me about my portability between
> distros".
> 
> But I doubt either of these readings are what was intended, which
> is quite unclear to me. Clarification?
> 
> --
> John Dallman
> Parasolid Porting Engineer
> 
> Siemens PLM Software
> 46 Regent Street, Cambridge, CB2 1DP
> United Kingdom
> Tel: +44-1223-371554
> john.dallman at siemens.com <mailto:john.dallman at siemens.com>
> www.siemens.com/plm <http://www.siemens.com/plm>
> From: lsb-discuss-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org
> <mailto:lsb-discuss-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org>
> [mailto:lsb-discuss-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org
> <mailto:lsb-discuss-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org>] On Behalf Of
> Brian Proffitt
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: lsb-discuss
> Subject: [lsb-discuss] AppChecker Survey List
> 
> 
> http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=uyGagZUNkZme0VU8H87ZLw_3d_3d
> 
> Please note: a link to this survey, with a nice invitation, will be
> embedded in the final release of AppChecker.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Brian Proffitt
> Community Manager
> Linux Foundation
> 
> AIM: StartXScribe
> 
> ---
> Linux Developer Network
> Linux.com
> Video.linuxfoundation.org <http://Video.linuxfoundation.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Brian Proffitt
> Community Manager
> Linux Foundation
> 
> AIM: StartXScribe
> 
> ---
> Linux Developer Network
> Linux.com
> Video.linuxfoundation.org <http://Video.linuxfoundation.org>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-discuss mailing list
> lsb-discuss at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss

-- 
Robert Schweikert                           MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
Software Engineer Consultant                          LINUX
rschweikert at novell.com
781-464-8147

Novell
Making IT Work As One



More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list