[lsb-discuss] LSB/OpenJDK GSOC Draft

Wichmann, Mats D mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Wed Mar 11 13:31:30 PDT 2009


Kay Tate wrote:
> "different" in line 4
> 
> Do we assume that the resulting product will still be "Java," or
> should we mention standard testing? 
> 
> Do we also want an informal assessment of resulting performance to
> ensure that there is not a major departure with the API
> substitutions?  
> 
> Or should the last two questions be our reactions to the patch set?

Well, I'd make trying to prepare patches for submission to
Upstream part of the project, but I wouldn't make having the
Result be Java (i.e. someone has certified it) be a requirement
Of a GSOC project.  Probably just stating the obvious...



More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list