[lsb-discuss] LSB/OpenJDK GSOC Draft

Alan Clark aclark at novell.com
Thu Mar 12 08:07:11 PDT 2009

>>> On 3/12/2009 at 08:40 AM, in message <20090312144010.GA11748 at mit.edu>, Theodore
Tso <tytso at mit.edu> wrote: 
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:12:00PM -0600, Kay Tate wrote:
>> "different" in line 4
>> Do we assume that the resulting product will still be "Java," or
>> should we mention standard testing?
> I thought about adding a requirement to use the TCK, but the TCK has
> interesting legal issues with respect to getting access to the TCK.
> Getting access to the TCK requires signing an NDA, and I'm not sure
> Google allows us to require students to sign agreemnts such as the TCK
> licensing agreement.    We might have to run the test for the student.
>> Do we also want an informal assessment of resulting performance to
>> ensure that there is not a major departure with the API
>> substitutions?
> Good point.  Do we know of specific benchmarks that should be used
> (like Volanomark, for example)?

What about the SPEC tests?  SPECjvm2008.

> 						- Ted
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-discuss mailing list
> lsb-discuss at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list