[lsb-discuss] Manual app battery: not that useful?
jdluhos at suse.cz
Fri May 22 10:33:32 PDT 2009
I have some comments to the manual app battery tests; although not in the
center of attention, they are now a mandatory part of LSB testing, and, as I
have learnt the hard way, not the easiest obstacle. In fact, I have even
thought whether it is a good idea to have them.
My observations (in no particular order):
* s390(x) machines, as virtuals running on some big iron, typically don't have
soundcards nor displays; X can only be run as a remote server. Thus:
* "alsaplayer" is confused (it runs, but refuses to load sound files)
* "celestia" is a torture even on a relatively fast link
* the same might apply on any non-standard arch where the user probably
does not have the physical machine under his/her table but connects to it
* Some users may need/have to run the tests over a networked session (see
above), which means that there are at least two pretty different scenarios:
for local screen and for networked screen; furthermore, the instructions for
testing do not always work well for networked screen (e.g. try pressing "Ctrl-
Q" in the "krdb" remote screen viewer; it will close the whole krdb).
* Downloading the packages according to the instructions in the dtk-manager is
overly complex; all we need is a simple script (please find an example
attached to this message) that downloads and possibly installs all the
packages for the user.
* All operations are tedious, pointless and totally mechanical; after some
time, the user will get pretty numb and just blindly clicking; I doubt
anything less than a spectacular crash will be noticed.
So, I ask: shouldn't we think about revamping the whole manual app battery,
possibly even removing it completely and automating some of the tests instead?
Best regards and thanks for listening,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 474 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20090522/2e437b5e/attachment.bin
More information about the lsb-discuss