[lsb-discuss] LSB -- next 4.1

Robert Schweikert rschweikert at novell.com
Thu May 28 04:39:50 PDT 2009

Both libgomp and libguide (Intel's OpenMP library implementation) have 
one use of syscall. Therefore LSB compliance of the libraries is not 
possible without changes.


Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> Dallman, John wrote:
>> We would like to have to option of using OpenMP in the Parasolid
>> solid modeller in the future. But we do want to stay LSB-compliant,
>> because that means we don't have to test on dozens of different
>> Linuxes.
> Okay, I know this has been strongly requested before, but it never
> seems to make it high onto the list.  Perhaps this will help
> propel it up another notch.
>> If you want me to try more experiments, I'm happy to do so.
> that might be a dangerous offer :)
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-discuss mailing list
> lsb-discuss at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss

Robert Schweikert                           MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
Software Engineer Consultant                          LINUX
rschweikert at novell.com

Making IT Work As One

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list