[lsb-discuss] list of undocumented interfaces: LSB 4.1 spec beta

Denis Silakov silakov at ispras.ru
Mon Nov 1 08:10:57 PDT 2010


Many of C++ symbols concern 128bit long doubles on PowerPC and zSeries.

There was some discussion about this:
http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2884#c42

Though we didn't seem to come to any decision...

On 10/29/10 20:55, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> I've put a page on the wiki:
>
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/SpecReview41
>
> which currently contains all the interfaces that spec
> generation ends up reporting have no documentation.
> For the c++ interfaces, I fed those through the demangler
> to also include the unmangled name.
>
> I'm not sure that all of these are actually
> "undocumented", it may be that some of the
> database linkages simply aren't right.
>
> The "undocumented" status of Xrender/Xft is
> not something new, and we know some of the libstdc++
> interfaces are and will remain "undocumneted".
>
> If anybody's got comments on anything here that's
> surprising (and note that some of these are in 
> covered in existing bugs, I just haven't done
> the correlation - e.g. the robust mutex ones are
> going to be little stubs that reference the
> POSIX documentation for the corresponding function)
> please let us know - here or comment in the wiki
> page.
>
> We'll continue to use this page for tracking spec
> review issues, although there should always be a
> bug as well for real problems.
>   

-- 
Regards,
Denis.




More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list