[lsb-discuss] how can LSB be a bit less trailing

Wichmann, Mats D mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Wed Apr 6 10:01:13 PDT 2011


Dallman, John wrote:
>> Jun 2014-Jun 2015 - LSB 6.1 is under development,
>>    considering FeatureX as of 3.2 as the latest possible
>>    version due to EntLin 5.0 being in Target Distros
> 
> Exactly why does LSB have to designate FeatureX 3.2 as being
> the *latest* possible version?

okay, so that's imprecise, sorry.

yes, any future version which remains binary compatible
is just fine on the distro side.

however, what I meant is on the LSB side, it could not
require features that only appeared in a later version
of FeatureX than 3.2.





More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list