[lsb-discuss] stat(), lstat() and fstat()

Wichmann, Mats D mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Wed Jan 26 06:23:02 PST 2011


Denis Silakov wrote:

> If it will make things more clear, I guess it would be safe to mark
> the interface itself as included. In this case, Navigator will say
> that it is included, but marked as Source Only (and thus is allowed
> to be missing in shared libs). 
> 
> Currently all symbols in question are not marked as included in the
> LSB Database - they only have a 'source only' flag which make them
> appear in
> headers. So there is a slight inconsistency between header
> generator and
> Navigator - the latter looks at the 'SrcOnly' flag only for interfaces
> explicitly marked as included.

but if they're marked as included, won't that cause stubs to
appear in libc?  the "magic" is that we don't resolve there,
but leave it to be fixed up by libc_nonshared.a and I think
that breaks if we add to stubs?



More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list