[lsb-discuss] GCC plugin versus lsbcc wrapper

[Wichmann, Mats D]

Craig.Scott at csiro.au wrote:
> It's pretty hard to follow the part of the Qt code that
> extracts this info. It's peppered with #ifdef's and manual
> symbol resolves. I can't say definitively one way or another
> how it derives the compiler, but I *think* it comes from
> recording the configure options into a configure-generated
> header which is then pulled in a build time.

yes, in that case it would "know" that we've said
CXX=lsbc++ or whatever the particulari invocation is.
Yuck.