[lsb-discuss] Google Summer of Code 2012: 14 good applications but only 12 slots
Denis Silakov
dsilakov at gmail.com
Tue Apr 17 20:44:49 UTC 2012
Maybe it would be honest to leave 3 slots for OpenPinting, 3 slots for
LSB (these are points 4-6) and 6 slots for kernel-related stuff?
Btw, is there any chance for some kernel projects to be implemented
under patronage of another organization? (E.g., I remember there was a
comment from Greg about KMSCON in openSUSE...).
On 04/18/2012 12:52 AM, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for now I have marked the following applications as accepted (not a
> ranking):
>
> 1. libjtapi by Daniel Dressler
> 2. PDF manipulation tools, with special focus on printing needs by
> Tobias Hoffmann
> 3. OpenPrinting web site: Enhancements for printer and driver
> administration, in depth security review by Jannes Jeising
> 4. Update LSB OLVER Core Test Suite by Roman Zybin
> 5. Add Dynamic Tests to the Linux Application Checker by Flid
> 6. Redesign LSB Navigator to be more independent from particular DBMS
> by Elena Egorova
> 7. Implement a Lightweight Data Race Detector for Linux Kernel Modules
> on x86 by Nikita Komarov
> 8. Formalization of Correct Usage of Kernel Core API by Denis
> 9. Advanced Source Code Instrumentation for the Linux Driver
> Verification Project by Evgeny Novikov
> 10. Formalization of Correct Usage of Kernel Core API by Misha
> 11. writable snapshot support for ext4 snapshot
> by Yongqiang Yang
> 12. Compat-vga for the Linux kernel by Ozan Çağlayan
> 13. KMSCON: A DRM based terminal emulator by David Herrmann
> 14. Implement device profiles for Btrfs filesystem by Ilya Dryomov
>
> We have only 12 slots (if we do not get additional ones from orgs who
> return slots) and therefore we have to reject two of these
> applications. So I want to ask you to find an agreement on whom not to
> take.
>
> Note that it is possible that a students have submitted more than one
> application and their other application(s) got also accepted. In this
> case the students we are deselecting now can drop back in. So let us
> deselect the students with the lowest priority for us but do not tell
> it to the students because the final decision is only made after
> duplicate resolution.
>
> Some remarks:
>
> As I did all the work of organizing the GSoC for the Linux Foundation
> (and I am payed 100% by Canonical now) I would like to keep the three
> slots which I have occupied for OpenPrinting (1-3).
>
> 8 and 10 are two applications for the same project idea. Perhaps here
> one student should be selected instead of dividing up the project
> between the two.
>
> Till
>
--
Regards,
Denis.
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list