[lsb-discuss] question on __longjmp_chk

[Wichmann, Mats D]

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Wichmann, Mats D <mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Petrie, Glen <glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com>wrote:
>
>>  From the lsb database, __longjmp_chk has never been in LSB.  My
>> question is about understanding what this means.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> When I use lsbcc (v=4.1.14)(with gcc-4.4) I get an undefined reference to
>> __longjmp_chk.  So, is there a way to resolve the reference or is this the
>> expected behavior of using lsbcc; meaning that the code being compiled
>> should (can) not use __longjmp_chk?
>>
>
>
> Expected.
>
> Some info, as usual is at https://navigator.org
>

urgh, my paste seems to have gotten partly eaten, leading to a competely
bogus link.

linuxbase.navigator.org, I meant.


> What's not mentioned here is that __longjmp_chk is a new-ish symbol, in
> LSB terms,
> it's tagged GLIBC_2.11 which is newer than anything included in LSB at
> thing point
> (will change as of LSB 5.0, but that's a different story).
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20120823/d51e80cf/attachment-0001.html>