[lsb-discuss] Call for Topics - 2012-02-15 conference call
Robert Schweikert
rjschwei at suse.com
Tue Feb 14 14:07:28 UTC 2012
Jeff,
On 02/14/2012 07:39 AM, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> This is a call for topics to discuss on the conference call this Wednesday.
>
> Current topics:
>
> - Infrastructure update and bug review.
>
> - Modularization proposals.
>
> Please follow up to the list. I'll post the final list later today.
I'd like to have a short, maybe 10 minute discussion and get a sense
about how people view the /usr merge w.r.t. impacting FHS and LSB.
FHS has:
From FHS 2.3[1]:
"/bin contains commands that may be used by both the system
administrator and by users, but which are required when no other
filesystems are mounted (e.g. in single user mode). It may also contain
commands which are used indirectly by scripts."
and
"The following commands, or symbolic links to commands, are required in
/bin."
Thus from my perspective there is nothing in FHS that prevents the move
of binaries from /bin, /sbin to /usr as long as a link exists back to
the new location.
However, there may be other sections of FHS and or LSB that would be
violated. If we agree that the merge/move is OK from FHS & LSB point of
view it would be great to add something to
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
to eliminate the argument once and for all.
Thanks,
Robert
--
Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX
Tech Lead
rjschwei at suse.com
rschweik at ca.ibm.com
781-464-8147
More information about the lsb-discuss
mailing list