[lsb-discuss] Thoughts on LSB ISO standard

Wichmann, Mats D mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Tue Jul 31 01:19:51 UTC 2012


On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Robert Schweikert <rjschwei at suse.com> wrote:

>> OTOH, the situation is different now. We do have an ISO standard, and
>> from the point of view of SC22 we do have to maintain that standard.
>
>
> Why do we have to maintain it?
>
> Why can we not just get rid of it or let it lapse and be done with this?

In the sense that this is what you agree when you submit a standard to
ISO, and thus what we promised: maintenance is an obligation.  However,
one possible outcome of that is to simply say you're going to let it drop
when  the question comes up, which it does on a pre-determined time
schedule.


More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list