[lsb-discuss] libjpeg API issues

Mats Wichmann mats at wichmann.us
Fri May 3 00:59:49 UTC 2013


On 05/01/2013 05:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mats Wichmann <mats at wichmann.us> writes:
> 
>> the issue is that we haven't seen the distros themselves eager to
>> support both parts of this "fork", if I can use that term here.  The Red
>> Hat / Fedora camp has come down on one side, the SUSE camp on the other
>> side, for example.
> 
> As near as I can tell, SUSE is also using libjpeg-turbo.  See, for
> example:
> 
>     https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807183
> 
> Am I missing something?
> 


okay, the bug indicates people in the opensuse team are missing
something.  It would be really useful if someone from LSB would update
with information.  There seems to be an impression that the somewhat
artificial split between lsb "core" and "desktop" means you can leave
out parts required by the "desktop" part, which is not the case
currently (we've talked about that, but it's an

and yes, at last check, the libjpeg-turbo pkg doesn't include any
library. which is an issue for "LSB compliance'.





More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list