[lsb-discuss] ISO standards for LSB standards after 3.1?

keld at keldix.com keld at keldix.com
Fri Sep 27 17:19:36 UTC 2013

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 03:48:55PM +0000, Dallman, John wrote:
> Mats Wichmann wrote:
> > There's been a couple of spurts of interest in reviving this track, if
> > you have reason to care, a comment here would be added to the tally...
> I have some reason, though it's not crucial. Siemens, my employer, likes
> being able to quote standards compliance, and complying with an ISO standard
> means something to a lot of people who have not heard of LSB.
> It's also helpful to me in trying to get more parts of the company to use
> LSB standards - but LSB 3.1 is getting to be somewhat obsolete. Having an
> ISO standard number for LSB 5.0 would help me, a bit, with persuading
> people to adopt it.

I am investigating together with some LSB people if we could make LSB 4.1 an ISO standard, and what
it will take of ressources to do it. If it is not easily done, I will not persue it.

best regards

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list